WHY???? Because!!!! Part II.

So WHY did the (UC)LA Times print Paul Pringle's special report about USC on the front page this morning?

Because.....

1. It was a SLOW news day.

2. Are SCORNED because USC has stated "No Comment" to its reporters. WHY are UCLA's "No Comments" about any investigations honored, while USC's are portrayed as a cover-up?

3. Are REHASHING "old" news and passing it off as "new" news.

4. Are not RESPECTING USC's correct stance on the NCAA rules that Mr. Pringle, himself, quoted in his article this morning: "NCAA bylaws forbid schools from publicly disclosing information from the association's investigations until the probes are complete".

5. Are UTILIZING "Advocate Journalism" techniques in printing defamatory words about USC in its article: "scant, bizarre, lumbering, jock-centric campus, modest academic ambitions, fattened the university endowment, well-oiled revenue engine, and guard bolted for the NBA" (well, so did UCLA's Kevin Love!).

6. Are BELIEVING the word of two ex-convicts as reputable!

WHY????

Because the (UC)LA Times covers up any UCLA investigations in its back pages and sensationalizes all of USC's on its front page!

Will the BIAS ever end?